A normal internet connection gets attacked, a lot. The majority of attacks are of the form “hello, anybody there?” – where most people just don’t answer. But sometimes, just sometimes, the question gets an answer. Depending on the answer, the attacker will start to explore.

A few weeks back I was a little bored and started fiddling. I wanted to play with my Cisco, but also wanted to play with OSSEC, but also has a GIS craving. In the end I decided to create a map of the people who ask, “hello”.

Take a look at the map and explanation if that sort of thing is your cup of tea.

I rank OSSEC as one of my favorite pieces of open source software, and finally decided to play around with it more in my own free time. (Yup, I do this sort of stuff for fun). My goal was quite simple: send syslog packets from my Cisco to my “proxy” server, running OSSEC. I found that, although OSSEC supports Cisco IOS logging, it didn’t really work. In fact, I couldn’t find any examples or articles of anybody actually getting it to work.

I initially tried to get it to work “correctly,” and soon settled to “just getting it to work.” I implemented some rules in the local_rules.xml file, which worked, but I’m pretty stubborn, and wanted to do it “correctly.” With a couple pots of tea I became much, much more familiar with OSSEC. The key (and a lot of credit) goes to Jeremy Melanson for hinting at some of the updates to the decoder.xml file that need to take place.

The first step is to read the OSSEC + Cisco IOS wiki page. Everything on that page is pretty straight forward. I then added three explicit drop rules at the end of my Cisco’s ACL:

...

access-list 101 deny tcp any host 220.244.xxx.xxx log
access-list 101 deny ip any host 220.244.xxx.xxx log
access-list 101 deny udp any host 220.244.xxx.xxx log

(220.244.xxx.xxx is my WAN IP, and I’m sure you could figure out xxx.xxx pretty darn easily, but I’ll x them out anyways).

To reiterate, OSSEC needs to be told to listen for syslog traffic, which you should be set on the Cisco. If you haven’t done this, go re-read the wiki above.

<remote>
<connection>syslog</connection>
<allowed-ips>192.168.0.1</allowed-ips>
</remote>

On or around line 1550 in /var/ossec/etc/decoder.xml I needed to update the regex that was used to detect the syslog stream.

...

<decoder name="cisco-ios">
<!--<prematch>^%\w+-\d-\w+: </prematch>-->
<prematch>^%\w+-\d-\w+: |^: %\w+-\d-\w+:</prematch>
</decoder>
 
<decoder name="cisco-ios">
<program_name>
<!--<prematch>^%\w+-\d-\w+: </prematch>-->
<prematch>^%\w+-\d-\w+: |^: %\w+-\d-\w+: </prematch>
</program_name></decoder>
 
<decoder name="cisco-ios-acl">
<parent>cisco-ios</parent>
<type>firewall</type>
<prematch>^%SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: |^: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: </prematch>
<regex offset="after_prematch">^list \d+ (\w+) (\w+) </regex>
<regex>(\S+)\((\d+)\) -> (\S+)\((\d+)\),</regex>
<order>action, protocol, srcip, srcport, dstip, dstport</order>
</decoder>


...

In the general OSSEC configuration file, re-order the list of rules. I had to do this because syslog_rules.xml includes a search for “denied”, and that triggers an alarm.

...
<include>telnetd_rules.xml</include>
<include>cisco-ios_rules.xml</include>
<include>syslog_rules.xml</include>
<include>arpwatch_rules.xml</include>
...

Remember that these dropped events will go into /var/ossec/logs/firewall/firewall.log. Because this is my home connection, and I don’t have any active_responses configured (yet!), I tightened the firewall_rules.xml file (lowering the frequency, raising the timeframe).

And in the end, I get a pretty email when somebody tries to port scan me.

Pretty email

OSSEC HIDS Notification.
2008 Nov 15 23:19:36
 
Received From: proxy->xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Rule: 4151 fired (level 10) -> "Multiple Firewall drop events from same source."
Portion of the log(s):
 
: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 denied tcp 4.79.142.206(36183) -> 220.244.xxx.xxx(244), 1 packet
: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 denied tcp 4.79.142.206(36183) -> 220.244.xxx.xxx(253), 1 packet
: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 denied tcp 4.79.142.206(36183) -> 220.244.xxx.xxx(243), 1 packet
: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 denied tcp 4.79.142.206(36183) -> 220.244.xxx.xxx(254), 1 packet
 
 
 
--END OF NOTIFICATION

I love my Snort, I really do.  But sometimes, I just don’t need all the extra overhead – sometimes the resources on a server are somewhat, limited.  Looking for a solution I stumbled upon PSAD , a way to detect port scans.  Since port scans are often one of the first tactics used to find vulnerabilities on a server, it is a pretty good idea to detect them.   Depending on the attack, I receive a nice little email telling me what is going on.  To test it out I first fired up nmap, and received a few emails.  Next I fired up nessus with updated plugins – you can be the judge.  I now have 50 emails from myself telling me somebody is doing something naughty:

\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Tue Jan 23 10:30:04 2007 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


         Danger level: [5] (out of 5) Multi-Protocol

    Scanned tcp ports: [11-41111: 337 packets]
            tcp flags: [SYN: 337 packets, Nmap: -sT or -sS]
       iptables chain: INPUT, 337 packets

               Source: 218.167.75.27
                  DNS: 218-167-75-27.dynamic.hinet.net

          Destination: 64.79.194.165
                  DNS: kelvinism.com

      Syslog hostname: kelvinism

     Current interval: Tue Jan 23 10:29:54 2007 (start)
                       Tue Jan 23 10:30:04 2007 (end)

Yea, you read that right. Three commands and you can run a pen-test on your website/webserver. So, how?

kelvin@home:~$ sudo apt-get install nikto  
kelvin@home:~$ sudo nikto -update  
kelvin@home:~$ nikto -h www.thoughtdeposit.net

As you can see, Nikto is a web server scanner, apparently for over 3200 dangerous files/vulnerabilities. Additional features can be seen at the Nikto website, yet you will certainly want to add this old gem to your webserver toolbelt as soon as possible.